A Partial Inquiry on Fulfillment Beyond Humanity
As humans, learning often feels good, food often tastes good, novelty brings joy to life, living by values that we set brings order to our consciousness, and besides very few…
[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section” _builder_version=”3.0.47″][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” _builder_version=”3.0.47″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.15″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat”]
“The Wisest Cricket” is a term used in jest (and absurdism) to refer to the human attempt to understand the universe and their place in it. The term is intended to refer to the absurdity of thinking that humans can ever acquire wisdom or genuine, complete information about the universe.
The logic behind the term is as follows:
If these points above are the case, then:
Below is an admittedly rough image of the relation between intelligence and actual worldly insight:
The idea of “The Wisest Cricket” intends to question the idea that homo sapiens – in their present form – can ever achieve some kind of firm grounding of insight about the universe and our place in it.
It is a kind of playful (not intentionally insulting) mocking of human attempts of “certain” meaning, or certainty itself, such as:
Absolutely none of those points above are certain, and they are examples of overconfidence by a cricket-equivalent intelligence (homo sapiens). It is clear that these beliefs can sometimes be pragmatically beneficial, and might help humans cope with existence, death, and uncertainty – but that doesn’t let us intellectually turn a blind eye to the fact that they can’t be verified.
There might be said, then, to be three possible paths for making meaning of existence as a human being:
“The Wisest Cricket” idea posits that the universe (and “the moral good” itself) must be explored if it is to be known, and that while we may be grateful to have been born a relatively intelligent human being, we should accept the (relatively) cricket-like extent of our mental capabilities, and seek certainty and wisdom-seeking through a more intelligent vessel than a human cranium.
Header image credit: PxHere
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
As humans, learning often feels good, food often tastes good, novelty brings joy to life, living by values that we set brings order to our consciousness, and besides very few…
I’ve been diving into “Human Enhancement” (Oxford) as of late, and came across a topic that was bristling in my own mind before I saw the name of the chapter….
(NOTE: This article was first drafted in 2012, and is among my oldest. While I still agree with some of the ideas mentioned here are still interesting to me, my…
Ray Kurzweil’s The Singularity is Near peaked my interest when he posited his reasoning for why there is likely no intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. By a mere matter of…
In an interview with Wired about his work building a brain at Google, Ray Kurzweil was asked about his thoughts on Steve Jobs’ notion of death as a natural part…
I am still of the belief that two of the most important conversations we can have with regards to the future of humanity and of sentient life in general are…