AGI Red Lines and Green Arrows
Recently, there has been a concerted effort within the United Nations to establish a set of international red lines for AI development, with the expressed goal of getting developed nations…
“For when he saw that almost all things necessarily required for subsistence, and which may render life comfortable, are already prepared to their hand, that men may abundantly attain wealth, honour, praise, may rejoice in the reputation of their children, yet that, notwithstanding, every one has none the less in his heart and home anxieties and a mind enslaved by wearing complaints, he saw that the vessel itself was in fault, and that all good things which were brought into it from without were spoilt by its own imperfections.”—Lucretius, On the Nature of Things
According to the National Center for Health Statistics, 13% of Americans over the age of 12 report taking antidepressants in the last month. The notoriously happy Swedes aren’t faring much better.
The first world is rife with suicide and depression.
We speak of improving our parenting skills. Of doing yoga. Of listening to the Eckhart Tolle. Of meditating. Of taking time to relax.
We act, for the most part, as if the inherent and consistent suffering of the human condition is unchanging, and that accepting or working with this condition is the best we can do. We might seek escape in an afterlife – if we simply live a good and humble life in this world. If we do seek freedom from suffering here, it is through pharmacological means (medication, alcohol, addition) – and these “escapes” are only temporary. Bearing our cross and nobly enduring the brutish hedonic treadmill is as good as it gets. Yoga might help… maybe some kale or something.
“Is it not a singular testimony of imperfection that we cannot establish our satisfaction in any one thing, and that even our own fancy and desire should deprive us of the power to choose what is most proper and useful for us? A very good proof of this is the great dispute that has ever been amongst the philosophers, of finding out man’s sovereign good, that continues yet, and will eternally continue, without solution or accord.”—Montaigne, Of a Saying of Caesar
Yet when we endure consistent and unearned sadness and anxiety – the root of the “problem of evil” – we do exactly what nature programmed us to do: Sisyphus-like, we find something that we think will solve our woes, and get back on the hedonic treadmill. “If I can just ____, then I’ll be happy.” “If I can just _____, things will be better.” Of course, it won’t be better, though, and we won’t be happier.
There are certainly arguments against mindless bliss. I’m not here referring to ceasing to solve problems, and simply plugging one’s brain into a pleasure-machine and drooling on oneself. I’m talking about rich, meaningful human life, void of the absolutely unnecessary suffering – life with a higher “hedonic tone”, as David Pearce (easily the most eloquent intellectual in the abolition of suffering – see https://www.hedweb.com/).
“The vessel is flawed” is Lucretius’ saying, and it’s one that I find helpful in enduring the treadmill, and in finding meaning it. Not meaning in suffering, but in its overcoming.
Relegating ourselves to an eternity of treadmill isn’t a viable option, and I argue that we should only endure suffering so long as we must, but should eagerly be shooting ourselves towards the following north stars:
There needn’t be a minute of sober resignation to suffering if we have aims to overcome it, and to turn the utilitarian tide for good – not just run faster on the treadmill.
The net tonnage of happiness should be undeniably increased, not tempted, humiliatingly – Tantalus-like – eternally.
Header image credit: Teakisi
Recently, there has been a concerted effort within the United Nations to establish a set of international red lines for AI development, with the expressed goal of getting developed nations…
AGI risk seems lower than it is because the people who know that AGI risk exists are almost all incentivized against talking about it openly. Broadly, there are two groups…
Some AI thinkers and funders believe that any governance is a net negative for innovation and signals dictatorship or oligarchy. Arguments for this position include: In this article, I’ll argue…
If there were a global AI-caused disaster, would that bring about the real possibility of global AI policy and coordination? I’m very much of the belief that a brute arms…
Discussions around AGI and technological progress often hinge upon near-term policy decisions. Okay, so we want this or that near-term decision on governance. More privacy. Less regulation. Whatever. But all…
In my discussions around posthumanism and AGI, I’ve noticed something curious: Almost all discussions in the intergovernmental world, tech media, and social media center around specific policy decisions – not…
In 1985, Microsoft was an underdog “good guy” – standing against big evil corps like IBM. In 2003, Google was an underdog “good guy” in a world of big evil…
We assume that the tech founders who are building artificial general intelligence (AGI) care about safety. The firms closest to creating AGI are sure to talk about it a lot….
Not that long ago, I posted an article titled: Arguments Against Friendly AI and Inevitable Machine Benevolence, and it resulted in an interesting dialogue with Ben Goertzel (his comments, and…