Pedestal Cope – Assuming Human “Plot Armor”
In business, blindly assuming you’ll be profitable is a recipe for bankruptcy. In the outdoors, blindly assuming you’ll find water and shelter is a recipe for death. And yet, many…
I’m writing to you as a friend.
Beliefs about the future are limiting your potential, and they’re working against your future well-being and power. I don’t want that for you.
Follow me for a minute.
Imagine traveling back in time 60 years and telling your grandmother about what your day-to-day life is like now, the year 2022:
She’d call this life a “dystopia.”
She’d likely also think it was sacrilegious, inconceivable, and radically “impossible” for two reasons:
But when you wake up, order Starbucks with Uber Eats and sit down to write code or answer emails or join Zoom calls for 9 hours straight, you don’t feel like this is impossible, and you don’t feel like you are morally astray from your grandmother.
If anything, your situation is much better. More convenient, more nimble. You can access what you need (friendships, productive work, information, entertainment) instantly, while your grandmother had huge limitations in her available career paths, her choice of entertainment, her choice of friendships, etc.
And we’re just getting started.
Nearly everyone I talk to thinks the world is going to be the same in 5-10 yrs
— Daniel Faggella (@danfaggella) November 24, 2023
…that the human condition will be the same
…that the role of man and machine will be the same.
What serenity these people must know… what peace.
But ignorance will not long be bliss.
As technology advances rapidly, procedurally generated content becomes incredibly powerful, VR becomes more realistic, and all first-world humans spend the majority of their waking hours on screens—often, on screens that have their content conjured forth by AI, i.e. Netflix, social media, etc.—you begin to contemplate some of the ideas about where society is going, and what the future of the human condition might be like:
You call these scenarios a “dystopia.”
They violate your ideas of what is sacred, and they are “impossible” for two reasons:
Your “dystopia” is myopia.
It’s a failure to see how fast changes to the human condition have occurred over the last 30 years, and a failure to accept that even more radical changes are soon to come.
But these changes in the human condition are merely a continuation of the same dynamic:
Humans adopt all technologies that satisfy their needs (financial, sexual, emotional, or otherwise) more quickly, more conveniently, or more completely than other available options.
Humans have never wanted almost anything that they claim to want (a new Corvette, a million dollars, a walk in the woods, a girlfriend). They want the fulfillment of particular needs and drives. Whatever technologies or processes fulfill those drives faster and better get adopted.
The statements that follow are self-evident to you, but would have seemed like sacrilege to your grandmother 60 years ago:
These statements below, or something just like them, will be self-evident to people in a few decades, but seem like sacrilege to you today:
I don’t know which of the VR, AGI, or brain-computer interface technologies are going to land first, so I’m not going to make hard predictions here. But I’m smart enough to know some of them will land, and the changes to the human condition will not be something I can stop.
But friend, why do these ideas bother you?
I’m telling you it’s fear.
And this fear is weakness.
The future is coming at us – hard and fast – and the ostrich strategy is no longer viable.
Grandma could put her head in the sand and not learn to use a laptop, order an Uber, or use the latest sales enablement platform, spend 10 hours a day on Zoom calls, or even shop online. She had the option to run out her remaining years without having to adjust to these “sacrilegious” changes to the human condition.
You, however, have no such choice.
You don’t get to say, “I’m only comfortable with technology that is <10% different from that which I experienced in my 20s and 30s.”
You won’t have a job. You won’t be able to be in touch with friends. You won’t be able to support the causes you care about. It’s all changing too fast now.
The way through is not Denial or Anger, the way through is Acceptance:

(Image from the full article The 5 Stages of Posthuman Grief – “Acceptance” Makes Progress Possible)
You accuse me:
“You’re just telling me to mindlessly adopt these new technologies?!”
“You’re saying I should give up on my values, and on the life I want to live?!”
No.
I’m telling you that if you have values you care to uphold, you don’t get to freeze them in time like the Amish.
You have to deal with the changes to the human condition and mold them proactively to be more of what you believe is good and less of what you believe is bad.
I’m telling you that you can only represent your values into the future if you step into the future – with the tools, resources, and new powers that that future will contain. You cannot step out of the river; the water is rising, and the pull is too strong.
I couldn’t be a good friend without telling you frankly:
If you have values that are important to you, you must imbue them into the future that’s coming at you – rather than denying or hiding from it. If the future disturbs you – face it squarely, take action, don’t count on your sense of disgust or ideas of the ‘sacred’ to save you.
i.e.:
Header image credit: Edsurge
In business, blindly assuming you’ll be profitable is a recipe for bankruptcy. In the outdoors, blindly assuming you’ll find water and shelter is a recipe for death. And yet, many…
Dr. Thomas Ray is Harvard-educated doctor of Biology, and also the original researcher in the Tierra Artificial Life project. Tierra ended up receiving major media coverage all over the world…
In the push towards bridging humanitarian efforts and advances in computing and artificial intelligence, there seem to be a minimal number of thinkers AND doers. Dr. Soenke Ziesche recognizes the…
We assume that the tech founders who are building artificial general intelligence (AGI) care about safety. The firms closest to creating AGI are sure to talk about it a lot….
How can you keep artificial intelligence from taking over your job? In my latest TEDx talk, I explore what I’ve learned (from hundreds of interviews) about job security in the…
The sixth and final episode of our series AGI Governance on The Trajectory is with Eliezer Yudkowsky, famed AI safety thinker and Co-founder at the Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Eliezer…
In 2025, it is no longer intellectually honest to completely shun the idea of artificial general intelligence (AGI) or AGI risk. Yet still, in Dec 2024 (the time of this…
This new installment of the Worthy Successor series is an interview with Joe Carlsmith, a senior advisor at Open Philanthropy, whose work spans AI alignment, moral uncertainty, and the philosophical…
Assuming AGI is achievable (and many, many of its former detractors believe it is) – what should be its purpose? I argue that the great (and ultimately, only) moral aim…