A Partial Inquiry on Fulfillment Beyond Humanity
As humans, learning often feels good, food often tastes good, novelty brings joy to life, living by values that we set brings order to our consciousness, and besides very few…
This essay draws upon a longer and more business-related article on Emerj.com titled Ambitious AI, which may be of interest for readers who want to go deeper on this topic.
Ambition has always required sacrifice.
Anyone who strives to be powerful (in business, government, science, etc) will use AI and other emerging technologies to minimize their time spent in unproductive activity, and maximize their time spent on productive activity.
Bill Gates doesn’t play tennis because he likes doing so more than working on his businesses and charities, but because some level ph physical exercise and diversion maintain him, and keep him optimally capable to do as much work as possible.
Soon, AI and other emerging technologies will allow ambitious people to forgo these unproductive “maintenance” activities – including time spent on hobbies and human relationships.
I’ll explore this by contrasting the habits and behaviors of ambitious people today – with those that are likely to be possible in the near future.
Today, people who strive to be maximally productive are forced to sacrifice much in the face of their productive goals. They take far fewer vacations, have fewer hobbies, spend less time with friends and family, and often much less time on sleep.
But they still have to “check the boxes” that keep humans sane and balanced. They have to do the unproductive “stuff” that keeps the monkey suit working – so that they can remain high-performing during their work time (i.e. the vast majority of their waking hours).
Here are the “boxes” the even powerful people must “check”:
Even the most powerful people on earth today need to do these things to remain optimally productive – but they don’t want to need those things.
Musk would definitely prefer not to have to stop working in order to eat, and I’m sure Oprah wishes she didn’t need sleep at all. Both wish they didn’t have to brush their teeth and clip their toenails. But it goes further: Not only would most powerful people forgo sleep and meal time if they could – they would forgo fun hobbies and relationships, too (by the way, I’m not morally judging them, I think this is completely logical).
Think about it this way:
This takes us to the future.
In the future, AI and emerging tech will help ambitious people to drastically increase the number of hours they spend in productive work (and the percent of effective hours worked) – and drastically decrease the hours they spend on non-work tasks. This will involve significant breaks from the current human condition.
Here are a handful of hypothetical examples of what might be possible in the coming 5-15 years:
NOTE: Absolutely all of the elements above will have their “envelopes pushed” by brain-computer interface and other transhuman tech, and they’re all slippy slopes leading us towards transhumanism (read: Transhuman Transition).
The outlandishly great economic and military advantages of this kind of super-performance tech is way too high for it to not be developed (are you unaware how much the US DoD invests on this kind of research already?).
Will there be hiccups and dead ends in these innovations?
Will there be seemingly “productive” tech with terrible, unproductive side-effects?
Certainly.
But that won’t stop them from coming. Whatever facets of our unproductive lives that can be shaved off in the interest of “net gain in productivity” will be shaved off, and AI and emerging tech will open up entirely new vistas for this kind of “shaving” in the coming decade.
What I’m painting above isn’t a dystopia (check yourself), I’d argue:
Today’s CEOs and aspiring politicians don’t have the the option to take long vacations, or to sleep 9 hours a night, or to not use cell phones and laptops 16 hours a day. Similarly, ambitious people in the future will be compelled to adopt and push the envelope on technology that enhances their productive powers and maximized their work time.
An immediate objection to this “ambitious tech” use-case might be:
“But Dan, people in these horrible, depressing conditions wouldn’t really be more productive at all, they’d be miserable!”
I’d respond to this with two points:
If your goal is to maximize your productivity or power, then you have no choice but to prepare to radically alter your life in order to maximize their output. The technologies of tomorrow will open up huge opportunities to gain advantages – and as always – they’ll involve sacrifice.
Header image credit: Portrait of a Man – Parmigianino
As humans, learning often feels good, food often tastes good, novelty brings joy to life, living by values that we set brings order to our consciousness, and besides very few…
In the very first part of this 2007 article, Nick Bostram of the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford writes: Traditionally, the future of humanity has been a topic for…
I’ve gotten my hands on a new copy of Human Enhancement, edited by Julian Avulescu and Nick Bostrom, and the first article I chose to delve into was titled: “Enhancements…
I’ve been diving into “Human Enhancement” (Oxford) as of late, and came across a topic that was bristling in my own mind before I saw the name of the chapter….
(NOTE: This article was first drafted in 2012, and is among my oldest. While I still agree with some of the ideas mentioned here are still interesting to me, my…
Ray Kurzweil’s The Singularity is Near peaked my interest when he posited his reasoning for why there is likely no intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. By a mere matter of…