A Partial Inquiry on Fulfillment Beyond Humanity
As humans, learning often feels good, food often tastes good, novelty brings joy to life, living by values that we set brings order to our consciousness, and besides very few…
The “Grand Trajectory” refers to the direction of the development of intelligence and sentience itself.
If the following two hypotheses are true:
…then the following is almost certainly also true:
The potential end-game destinations of developing super-human intelligence are many, but most imagined futures boil down to some variation of the following:
It is unclear as to which of these scenarios humanity should strive towards, or how we should go about it.
In the long term, it seems somewhat inevitable that the best possible scenarios (in utilitarian terms) would involve the proliferation of post-human intelligence, well beyond current humanity or cognitively enhanced humanity. If the richness and depth of the sentience of an entity indicate its moral worth, then astronomically advanced (and conscious) superintelligence would be the most (a concept that I explore in great depth at the end of my TEDx at Cal Poly).
While the exact path to a future of great utilitarian good is unclear, I believe that the management of the Grand Trajectory will involve international and multilateral collaboration beyond anything humanity has done thus far, because:
For this reason, a positive transition for the Grand Trajectory will likely involve:
The stewardship of the Grand Trajectory is the most important role of humanity – and indeed is the Cause. Hopefully, the next 5-10 years will see more and better ideas for handling this stewardship properly – and international willingness to collaborate on the greatest moral concern of our species, and maybe of the universe itself.
Disclaimer: By no means do I believe that all human efforts not directly aimed at positively influencing the Grand Trajectory are fruitless. We need to handle our social issues, care for our environment, raise good children, run good businesses, etc. What I posit, however, is that – should by first two hypotheses (above) be correct – then all of these other activities would only be relevant (in utilitarian terms) insomuch as they stabilize earthly life and human society for long enough for us to determine and enact the best Grand Trajectory scenario.
Image credit: sostenitori
As humans, learning often feels good, food often tastes good, novelty brings joy to life, living by values that we set brings order to our consciousness, and besides very few…
In the very first part of this 2007 article, Nick Bostram of the Future of Humanity Institute at Oxford writes: Traditionally, the future of humanity has been a topic for…
I’ve gotten my hands on a new copy of Human Enhancement, edited by Julian Avulescu and Nick Bostrom, and the first article I chose to delve into was titled: “Enhancements…
I’ve been diving into “Human Enhancement” (Oxford) as of late, and came across a topic that was bristling in my own mind before I saw the name of the chapter….
(NOTE: This article was first drafted in 2012, and is among my oldest. While I still agree with some of the ideas mentioned here are still interesting to me, my…
Ray Kurzweil’s The Singularity is Near peaked my interest when he posited his reasoning for why there is likely no intelligent life elsewhere in the universe. By a mere matter of…