Setting a Direction for AGI Ethics
How should we influence the “values” or “ethics” or “morality” of a future AGI? I’m not sure this kind of direction setting is possible, and it may be entirely futile,…
I was very fortunate last week to be able to catch up with Dr. Dale Purves of Duke University. I first found Dr. Purves via his research website, where I stumbles upon a trove of interesting empirical answers to various conundrums of perception. Having explanations for these perceptual mind games is far more insightful than merely being surprised by them. I probably spent much more time on exploring the “See for Yourself” section of Dr. Purves’ site than I should have, and if you follow the link below I think you’ll get an idea as of why (the experiments in “motion” were particularly fascinating for me).
(The above image was taken from: https://www.purveslab.net/seeforyourself/)
Dr. Purves’ work over the last number of decades has focused heavily on how perception plays a part in understanding how the brain functions – with much of his best known work in the area of sight and vision.
In the above interview we talk about his personal introduction to the field of Neuroscience and Neurobiology, the problems with the current approaches being followed aiming to replicate the brain to understand it’s workings, the need for a more thorough understanding of biology and evolution to understand the brain itself, as well as some potential future directions for neuroscience (and their limitations).
Those of you interested in transhumanism may particularly like the portion of our conversation relating to Dr. Purves’ perspective on how brain research is currently being funded and approached at present (IE: the perspective of the Blue Brain Project and Kurvweil’s work with Google and elsewhere), in addition to the apparent failure of AI to catch up to biology in the area of vision (this portion of the conversation kicks in about 5:45 into the video above.
I wanted to give an additional thanks to Dr. Purves for taking the time for the interview here at Sentient Potential, and providing a neurobiology perspective on the issues we aim to explore here. Learn more about his work at the link above – and enjoy the interview.
Best,
Daniel Faggella
How should we influence the “values” or “ethics” or “morality” of a future AGI? I’m not sure this kind of direction setting is possible, and it may be entirely futile,…
1 – Does “Making the Most” of Our Biological Lives Provide Insight to How We Might or Could “Make the Most” of Our Post-Human Lives? My greatest fascination in the…
Over the course of my studies in the domain of transhumanism (and particularly the ethical issues and opportunities in this domain), its never too long in my exploration that I…
The first philosophy book that I ever dove into was Nichomachean Ethics, at age 19. The emphasis on self-cultivation and the articulation of the depths of fulfillment pulled me in,…
Due to my given course of life, I have – at the time of this writing – few acquaintances who are philosophers. Prof Galen Johnson, head of the philosophy department…
One of my favorite parts about interviews is that I’m able to bounce ideas off of the people behind the blogs I read. Mr. Thomas Frey is the author at…
I am still of the belief that two of the most important conversations we can have with regards to the future of humanity and of sentient life in general are…
Will intelligent machines have morals? Will the world and it’s sentient technologies agree on any kind of ethical “code?” Will democracy still reign when intelligent technologies run essentially all aspects…
“Okay, lets get started, but first let me grab my pint” said Dr. Aubrey de Grey, as he walked with laptop in hand to his glass. Sitting down and taking…