“Digitized and digested” is the future scenario which I consider to be a likely long-term future for humanity, should we survive the initial growing pains of the singularity. By long-term, I could mean 100 or 10,000 years – though the real timeframe is likely to lie somewhere in between.
The scenario is as follows:
Phase 1: Digitized
At some point, cognitive enhancement makes shared physical existence between humans dangerous, because drastically different sets of values and mental capacities make peaceful coexistence more or less impossible. Immersive VR eventually gives way to mind uploading and full-blown San Junipero-style existence in a virtual world.
As humans enter a digital substrate to live in an expansive virtual world (hopefully full of blissful experiences of many types that we can’t possibly imagine), there will be a group of enhanced humans – or more likely a superintelligent artificial intelligence – which will manage the computational substrate that houses the human simulations.
Phase 2: Digested
Eventually, the substrate manager (be it AI or enhanced humans) will have what it believes to be better or more productive uses in mind for the computational resources that are being used to house the many human simulations. At this point, the substrate manager will remove the human simulations (ending their conscious experiences) and use that processing power for other ends which it deems to be more important (possibly inventing a new technology, exploring a new part of the galaxy, calculating a massively complex problem about physics, etc).
There are many other potential future scenarios for the trajectory of intelligence – but if we care about the continuity of individual human consciousness (though it’s not completely clear that under all circumstances we should) – then “Digitized and Digested” seems to be about as good a scenario as could be conceived.
Assuming this kind of mind uploading is possible, there will be extreme conflict (likely violent military conflict) around who controls the substrate that houses this human intelligence.
Most of humanity will be willing to enter this uploaded state in order to exist blissfully and carefree, while a small minority of humanity will see the tremendous opportunity for control and power that a transhuman transition affords them (see: “Lotus Eaters vs World Eaters“). It is this latter group that will control the substrate that houses AI, and houses the majority of uploaded human sentience.
Given how drastically ideas and instincts around morality have evolved from apes to humans – and how frequently human values cause conflict – it is essentially impossible to suspect that an ever-expanding superintelligence would be interested in sustaining human life as a major priority. I’ve argued (in a short essay called “the Moral Singularity“) that an expanding intelligence is likely to change and mold its equivalents of what we call “morality” (which will be distantly beyond human comprehension) many times over – sooner or later doing away with uploaded humans.
With any luck, however, the uploaded humans would be able to experience many years of blissful, expansive experience before the superintelligence that controls their computational substrate decides to use that computation for more worthwhile ends. This would not be unlike the fate of many species over the previous billion years of life on earth. They made their mark, they spawned forth new forms, and eventually, those new forms pushed out the old.
Note: I’m in no way trying to frame the “digitized and digested” scenario as the most likely scenario, nor am I certain about the possibility of mind uploading. Rather, this scenario is used to represent a likely best-case scenario (from the perspective of humanity) of the post-human transition.
Many renown technology pundits, entrepreneurs, and inventors have posited a similar vision of an artificial intelligence-enabled future: Artificial intelligence and other future technologies will amass tremendous wealth in the hands of a few…
This is an interview with Jack Shanahan, a three-star General and former Director of the Joint AI Center (JAIC) within the US Department of Defense. Surely, a defense leader like…
In business, blindly assuming you’ll be profitable is a recipe for bankruptcy. In the outdoors, blindly assuming you’ll find water and shelter is a recipe for death. And yet, many…
[If that title comes across as shocking or offensive, bear with me. Before you make assumptions about my opinions on post-human morality and moral stratification, please read the article.] I…
I don’t watch fiction, and I don’t read fiction, almost as a rule. While I respect it as a medium, and consider it valuable in fleshing out future scenarios that…
Both artificial intelligence and nuclear warheads could both wipe out human life, though it might be possible for superintelligent AI to be even more destructive. That being said, AI is…
The AI value alignment argument goes something like this: As artificial intelligence will continue to approach human-level intelligence Artificial intelligence will generally be driven by a reward function, by a…
Once the grand vision of artificial general intelligence (or the general importance of AI Power in the years ahead) is seen or, there are only two main responses from extremely…
This is an interview with Emmett Shear, CEO of SoftMax, co-founder of Twitch, former interim CEO of OpenAI, and one of the few public-facing tech leaders who seems to take…