Artificial Intelligence Job Loss is a Comparatively Minor Concern
How can you keep artificial intelligence from taking over your job? In my latest TEDx talk, I explore what I’ve learned (from hundreds of interviews) about job security in the…
Sebastien Krier of Google DeepMind joins us in our first episode in a brand new AGI Governance series on The Trajectory.
Beginning his career studying law at King’s College, Sebastien became the Head of Regulation for the UK’s Office for Artificial Intelligence in 2018. Today, he works in policy and strategy development at Google DeepMind, where he has resided for the last two years.
Seb’s approach to monitoring AGI development involves a focus on capabilities and risks – as well as rethinking participatory governmental processes to be more nimble and representative. Seb sees society’s infrastructure writ large (rather than just policymakers) as being involved in the changes ahead, and shares ideas of what a more nimble process could look like.
Along the way, we unpack his desired future scenarios of man and machine – and he and I hash out his thoughts about whether AI will empower our will and agency, or diminish it. Seb is my favorite policy thinker within any of the major AGI labs, and I’m grateful he could join us as guest #1 in this series.
I hope you enjoy this conversation with Sebastien:
Subscribe for the latest episodes of The Trajectory:
Below, I’ll summarize Seb’s main points from each of the four sections of our interview.
5.5 out of 10.
Seb believes that it’s important to monitor, research, and hold high-level discussions on governance, but he’s cautious about rushing into new global institutions or mandates right now. His stance reflects a balanced approach, emphasizing the need to understand potential risks and capabilities incrementally rather than enforcing rigid policies prematurely.
This incremental approach seems largely to be the stance of most of the large AGI labs.
Sebastien sees AGI governance as having three primary aims:
Seb suggests that AGI governance would involve integrating technology within governmental operations, improving efficiency by automating certain responsibilities, and enhancing state capacity.
He emphasized that democracy could also be reimagined, using AI to better synthesize public opinion and streamline constituent feedback, making the democratic process more responsive. In Seb’s view, governments may want to simulate policy outcomes to refine decision-making and explore new voting methodologies, while acknowledging that global AGI governance might require international collaboration and faster, more adaptable processes.
(His emphasis on more robust and participatory governmental processes was a major theme in our pre-interview conversation and during the interview itself – maybe one day these topics will warrant their own interview series about the future of governance as we approach strong AI.)
Seb suggests that for effective AGI governance, it’s crucial to involve experts from diverse fields, like economics, to provide fresh perspectives on AGI’s impact across various domains. He advocates for more exploration of international governance and AI’s potential for public good, coupled with discussions about ideal outcomes and potential risks to guide progress thoughtfully.
He also emphasizes the need for improved methodologies in evaluating AGI capabilities, drawing analogies to randomized control trials in social sciences.
…
How can you keep artificial intelligence from taking over your job? In my latest TEDx talk, I explore what I’ve learned (from hundreds of interviews) about job security in the…
In my discussions around posthumanism and AGI, I’ve noticed something curious: Almost all discussions in the intergovernmental world, tech media, and social media center around specific policy decisions – not…
Many of my favorite quotes of Ralph Waldo Emerson seem to point to an important overarching idea, which I might summarize this way: We (humanity) exist as an arbitrary point…
The human race has two critical questions to answer in the 21st century: 1. What is a beneficial transition beyond humanity? 2. How do we get there from here…
Dr. Thomas Ray is Harvard-educated doctor of Biology, and also the original researcher in the Tierra Artificial Life project. Tierra ended up receiving major media coverage all over the world…
In the push towards bridging humanitarian efforts and advances in computing and artificial intelligence, there seem to be a minimal number of thinkers AND doers. Dr. Soenke Ziesche recognizes the…
The philosopher David Pearce has posited that the pain-pleasure axis of conscious experience may well be the “world’s inbuilt metric of value,” a kind of ultimate barometer of good or…
In the coming decades ahead, we’ll likely augment our minds and explore not only a different kind of “human experience”, we’ll likely explore the further reaches of sentience and intelligence…
Since the publication of the Worthy Successor essay in 2023, I’ve been glad to see the enthusiasm around exploring posthuman futures from people in tech and policy (especially on Twitter,…